READING THE TEA LEAVES ON THE INDIA CHINA GEOPOLITICAL TANGO
“August 2023 is unfolding as a very interesting time in Asian and even
global geopolitical dynamics, presaged by the 30th of August 2023
Super Blue Moon, a rare celestial phenomenon.” – Col RS Sidhu
Four interesting developments, with a significant impact on India China
relations, are underway in near simultaneous time frames.
On 8th of August 2023,
the three ex Chiefs of Indian Army, Air Force, and Navy arrived in Taipei,
Taiwan to attend the Ketagalan Forum Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue 2023. This
was followed through with a talk delivered by Gen MN Naravne, former COAS of
Indian army, at the 6th International Rangzen (Independence)
Conference in New Delhi, on 16th August 2023. Even more significant,
is the presence of representatives from Tibet Parliament in Exile, and Umit
Hamit, Uyghur freedom fighter, during the talk.
On 13th
and 14th of August 2023, the 19th Military Corps
Commander level meeting between India and China was held at Chushul. Of an even
greater interest is the follow on meetings between the Divisional Commanders of
the two armies at Daulat Beg Oldie and Chushul on 18th and 19th
of August 2023, portending a probable softening of China’s stance on the
ongoing India and China Occupied Tibet (COT) border standoff between the
militaries of the two countries.
On 17th of August 2023,
the top ranked Chinese housing conglomerate, Evergrande, with a US Dollar 300
billion debt including 19 billion in offshore debts, filed for bankruptcy in
the US.
Compulsions of Current Chinese Leadership
Since the coming to power of the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in China, their first and foremost priority is to
retain control over all Government apparatus at all costs. Hence, all organs of
Government are subordinated to the control of CCP. The affairs of the CCP have
traditionally been managed through an informal oligarchic power sharing
arrangement between its major political factions.
The second primacy in long term
Chinese thought is to replace the existing US led West Bloc global power structure
with a Sino-centric world order.
Xi Jinping, by suborning the
oligarchic model, has emerged as the most powerful public figure of China. The
three most powerful hats of the General Secretary of CCP, President of People’s
Republic of China (PRC), and Chairman of Central Military Commission (CMC),
adorn his head. To him, and his loyalists, ensuring his continuing grip over
the levers of power of the CCP is of primary concern, overriding all other
interests. But a gloomy economic outlook is impacting his firm grip over the
state power apparatus, as it impacts the unquestioned primacy of the CCP.
The Housing sector in China, which
accounts for one quarter of its GDP, has witnessed an alarming 33% drop in
sales. On 17th of August 2023, the
top ranked Chinese housing conglomerate, Evergrande, with a US Dollar 300
billion debt including 19 billion in offshore debts, filed for bankruptcy
safeguards in the US. The second leading Chinese housing conglomerate,
Country Garden, with a US Dollar 180 billion debt is also on the verge of
collapse. The bursting of the housing finance bubble is the first overt sign of
the economic quicksand which is overwhelming the Chinese economy.
On 16th of August 2023,
the monthly economic data released by China reflected a dramatic slowdown in
industrial production, and domestic retail market. Since the industrial sector
contributes 33% to Chinese GDP, major slowdown of demand is of critical
concern. However, it is the non-sharing of unemployment figures, which in June
2023 already stood at a record high of 21%, which should be of more relevance to
the discerning analysts, as it highlights the political sensitivities of the
CCP.
This political sensitivity is
further evidenced by the ‘Qiushi’, an important official publication of the
CCP, publishing within hours of the report, selected excerpts from a 7th
February 2023 speech of Xi Jinping to senior CCP officials, highlighting “…economic
challenges (that included) food, wealth distribution, healthcare, housing,
elderly care, and childcare…” and exhorting “…patience and resilience…in
pursuing national rejuvenation…to look at common prosperity as a long term
mission…”.
The aspects highlighted in the
excerpts are the very key vulnerabilities that are adversely impacting not only
the Chinese economy, but also the hold of CCP over the country’s 1.4 billion
population. China is not self-sufficient in food grains to feed its huge
population. The key to economic revival of China is its private sector, which
contributes 60% of its GDP and provides 80% urban employment. But the policy
contradiction inherent in wealth distribution and revival of the private sector
is the biggest contributor to the gloomy economic outlook. While it is anathema
to its private sector, for CCP it is a matter of survival.
The cumulative impact of the three
major factors, discussed above, is fuelling social unrest which is further exacerbated
by the budgetary constraints to look after its ageing population.
Geopolitically, China is confronting
a two front challenge. The growing US led international alliances are
challenging China’s supremacy in its eastern maritime region and inhibiting its
irrevocable resolve to reunite Taiwan with the Chinese mainland. To the
southwest China has confronted itself in a military standoff with India in the
COT region.
The two front geopolitical
confrontation comes at a time when the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force
(PLARF), its strategic bulwark, is in a disarray, as discernible from the
sacking of the two topmost military commanders of PLARF, and their being replaced
with a commander from the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), not a well
versed Rocket Force professional. The dramatic penalisation of the PLARF
hierarchy was enforced consequent to weak professional performance by this
force, under full international media glare, during the show of force across
Straits of Taiwan, post Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of US House of
Representatives, visit to Taiwan in 2022.
Economic downturn leading to social
unrest directly threatens the primacy of the CCP, and is by itself sufficient
cause to unleash political events that could unseat Xi Jinping. This leaves two
geopolitical options for Xi Jinping. First is to employ military force against
India, the weaker of the two adversaries. However, the growing security
linkages between India and US makes the success of this option uncertain.
The second option is to take a
temporary step back in confronting India, and agree to a face saving
de-escalation along the contested region of COT.
China’s proclivity for temporary
geopolitical shifts is best covered in “Thrust & Logic of China’s Foreign
Policy”, and “Postscript April 2014”. These can be accessed at links given
below
https://valleysandvalour.blogspot.com/2020/08/thrust-logic-of-chinese-foreign-policy.html
https://valleysandvalour.blogspot.com/2020/08/postscript-april-2014-thrust-logic-of.html
Considerations of Current Indian Leadership
The Indian military is currently in the throes
of a Government driven major reorganisation of its apex military hierarchy and
changes in the troop profile of its frontline fighting units. This is bound to
adversely impact its combat potential to withstand decisive military operations
by China. An effective disengagement along the borders with COT shall give the
Indian military a 3 to 5 years window of relative peace to reorganise,
re-equip, and assimilate new weapons and equipment for fighting wars of the future.
India’s security and diplomatic establishment
has been traditionally wary of antagonising China. An increasing convergence of
mutual national interests between India and the US, led by the latter’s
geopolitical need to forge an alliance with India against China, has provided India
with greater freedom of manoeuvre to explore additional diplomatic avenues to
pressurise China to accept a disengagement in the COT region. India now feels
emboldened to signal its willingness to widen the diplomatic confrontation into
China’s area of core interest, that is Taiwan and COT.
However, India is also wary of falling prey to
US pressures not in its national interests. Therefore, a stand down along the
northern borders also advantages India in withstanding alliance pressures that
are inimical to its interests.
Indian political leadership is focused on the
coming General Elections in the country due by March 2024. The increasingly
strident rival political discourse in the run up to the elections have vitiated
the internal security environment. A disengagement along the northern borders
can be portrayed as a major achievement in pursuit of a nationalistic agenda.
Gazing at the Tea Leaves
The developments at the ongoing India
China Military Commanders meetings does indicate a narrowing down of
differences on disengagement and de-escalation in the COT region. The prolonged
negotiations impart a sense of urgency to its proceedings, in the backdrop of a
strong possibility of a Modi – Xi one on one engagement on the sidelines of the
upcoming BRICS Head of States and Governments meeting scheduled shortly in
South Africa.
China’s internal political
contradictions shall play a key role in not giving way on all areas of military
discord with India, as China wilting under Indian pressure will impact the very
survivability of Xi Jinping, already under internal flak for downturn in
China’s economy.
An
unfavourable outcome of the Military Commanders meetings shall definitely cast
a negative shadow on the all-important Modi – Xi meeting, if it materialises. Chumar,
Charding Ninglung Nallah (CNN) Track Junction, and patrolling points in Depsang
Plains are some of the more contentious points for de-escalation. China is most
sensitive to de-escalation at Depsang plains, where their critical G 315 road
runs close to Indian defences of Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO) across the Karakoram
Pass, and is unlikely to agree to any de-escalation here. So a consensus on one
or two major confrontation points opposite eastern Ladakh is a more likely
probability.
Xi Jinping
also has the option to counterbalance refusal to disengage at Depsang bulge, by
consenting to attend the G 20 summit of Heads of States and Governments
scheduled at New Delhi on 9-10 September 2023. However, the diplomatic gains
for India of such a gambit would be metaphorical.
India on its part, should be clear
that there can be no real rapprochement with China, the gulf in the core
national interests is just too wide. What it can look at is a temporary step
back by China, before it militarily challenges India at an opportune
geopolitical moment.
Comments
Post a Comment