INDIA’S STAND ON UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL (UNHRC) 46/L1, 2021 RESOLUTION “PROMOTING RECONCILIATION, ACCOUNTABILITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN SRI LANKA”

 

The 23 March 2021 resolution “Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka” in the 47 member UNHRC was adopted after 22 States voted for the resolution, 11 states voted against, and 14 States abstained from voting.

European Union countries were prominent supporters of the resolution, while Russia, China, Bangladesh and Pakistan were the key dissenters. India, Japan and Nepal were the leading countries who abstained from voting on the resolution.

Despite abstaining from the vote, India’s nuanced statement during the discussion on the resolution showcases her expectation for Sri Lanka to meet its commitment to the 13th Amendment of Sri Lanka’s constitution devolving powers to the Provincial Assemblies, while voicing India’s  support for stability and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka.

India’s stand pursues its perceived national interests of countering the China-Pakistan influence in Sri Lanka, underscores its continuing pursuit of Sri Lankan Tamils aspirations within the broad framework of Sri Lankan constitution, and keeps the door open for strategic investments by Indian corporate houses within Sri Lanka. But what’s left unsaid is equally relevant and that is India’s opposition to Western countries interference in internal matters of sovereign countries through selective espousing of Human Rights issues.


Veteran Col RS Sidhu, independent strategic analyst, and author of the successful book “SUCCESS FROM BEING MAD”.

Excerpt from his upcoming book “ELEPHANT ON THE HIGH HIMALAYAS”, on India China discourse and how its impacting the geostrategic arena, which is due for being published shortly, “The twenty first century is witnessing a monumental ‘Clash of Civilisations’ on the high Himalayas, between India and China, representing two of the oldest continuous civilisations the world has known. The outcome of this clash shall not only determine the future of a third civilisation, which is Tibetan, but shall also set the geostrategic discourse for the world at large, truly making it the ‘Asian Century’. A resurgent Bharat is looked at as a key threat by China to realise its ambition of establishing a new Sino-centric world order. A threat which needs to be nipped in the bud, before it becomes too powerful to counteract.” 

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
WHIMSICAL VETERANS’ TRAVELOGUE TREK RAJPUR (DEHRA DUN) - BENOG SANCTUARY (MUSSOORIE) & BACK 7 th of April 2024 (Shahanshahi Ashram – Barloweganj – Library – Clouds End – Benog Top and back) ( Trek ascent from 2,300’ to 7,300’ and round distance of 53 kms in 15 hrs )   “ There is something in the air of the Doon Valley that makes it ideal for the veterans to laze around under the sun or in shade depending on the season of the year, imbibe heady spirits, and undertake quirky adventures from time to time, all in like-minded company. In other words, just being whimsical. ” – Col RS Sidhu “ They (veterans) have more ‘to strive, to seek, to find and not to yield’ as they pad up to go one more time in their second inning. How dull it would be to rust! What thrill awaits those who seek newer horizons in travels across the unknown worlds... ” – Ganesh Saili, noted author, in his foreword to ‘Laddakh Through The Eyes Of Whimsicals’.   The Whimsical Outlook I...
Read more
Image
  US DILEMMA OVER UKRAINE CRISIS & GLOBAL GEOPOLITICAL POWER SHIFT   “On the global stage, words of dominant geopolitical powers may or may not reflect their true resolve and capabilities. But their actions during crucial geopolitical power plays are strongly indicative of their intent and capabilities, or lack of them.” – Veteran Col RS Sidhu   Backdrop To understand Ukraine one should grasp the two truisms of US polity. First, US is a nation constantly in search of an enemy. Second, is the presence of influential policy lobbyists who are the main operators of the levers driving its foreign policy. In the eight decades since the 1940s, US has engaged in near continuous ideological conflict and warfare world-wide, well beyond its sovereign borders, to safeguard its perceived geopolitical interests. Its conflict with communist ideology led it to two major military interventions. The Korean war from 1950 – 53, and the Vietnam war from 1955 – 1975. The collapse of the So...
Read more
Image
  ‘ FOG OF WAR ’ & BOOBY TRAPS IN THE KILLING OF ISMAEL HANIYEH   “A General with ‘ winning ways ’ is one who is as proficient in the science and art of covering the battlefield with the ‘ fog of war ’ as also in piercing through this veil, while employing it as a key strategy to strike at the ‘ OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Action) Loop’ of the adversary.” – Col RS Sidhu   Backdrop “… An enemy should be destroyed without a trace .” - Chanakya Obfuscating the battlefield is a strategy as old as Mahabharat, where the Pandavas employed grey zone propaganda to spread the half-truth of ‘Ashwathama is dead’, to neutralise Guru Dronacharya, the leading general of the Kauravas army, and Krishan orchestrated a fake sunset to set the stage for Arjun to kill Jayadrath.    During World War II, the detailed planning and execution of Operation ‘ Overlord ’ to invade Nazi Germany occupied Europe, was matched by an equally meticulous deception plan codena...
Read more